class=”sc-29f61514-0 icZBHN”>
The small room made its decision without opposition. The National Council had already recommended rejecting the initiative in May.
The initiative aims to stipulate in the Federal Constitution that interference with the physical or mental integrity of a person requires his or her consent – and that those affected should not be punished or suffer professional or social disadvantages if they refuse this consent.
The Federal Council and the majority of both councils argued that the requirement goes far beyond the issue of vaccination and would lead to significant legal uncertainty, for example with regard to the criminal justice system. Nowadays, no one is allowed to be vaccinated against their will.
(SDA)
Source:Blick
I am Liam Livingstone and I work in a news website. My main job is to write articles for the 24 Instant News. My specialty is covering politics and current affairs, which I’m passionate about. I have worked in this field for more than 5 years now and it’s been an amazing journey. With each passing day, my knowledge increases as well as my experience of the world we live in today.
