There are tasks like this: “Drafting a new employment contract for this manager including a bonus of 20,000 francs.” Or, “Write a response to this internal sexual harassment complaint.” Or: “Write the notice of termination to this employee due to non-performance.”
The quickly infamous ChatGPT service takes on any writing task assigned to it, with sometimes better, sometimes worse results. Despite the still unstable quality, the artificial intelligence of the company Open AI represents a salvation in everyday work for some people who have difficulty writing texts.
US banks block the feature
Only: Can you entrust everything to the online program? Also internal trade secrets and sensitive personnel information? And is it even possible to get serious with the texts? In the US, several well-known large companies answer these questions with no. As the Bloomberg news agency reports following an analysis by market research firm Gartner, several Wall Street companies such as Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and Citigroup have already blocked the chatbot. The fear of an outflow of sensitive information by lazy employees seems too great.
According to Gartner’s research, only 3 percent of companies surveyed have responded in such a prohibitive manner. However, more than half of them are in the process of formulating new guidelines for dealing with ChatGPT.
And in Switzerland? CH Media asked several major local companies about their reaction to the intelligent application, which, according to a survey by the social media platform Fishbowl, is already being used by 40 percent of employees in the US to write emails or reports – often without informing the administrator. .
ZKB does not want to use the chat robot
The result: the subject is on the table for the requested companies – from Coop to Migros, Novartis, Roche, Swisscom, SBB to the Post of Swiss. And for that reason, measures have already been taken.
The Zürcher Kantonalbank is restrictive. Spokesman Marco Metzler says that it is not disclosed which apps and websites are blocked at the bank. But: “ChatGPT is not used for business purposes at the bank and is not available for that purpose.” The service is therefore not accessible to ZKB employees.
Coop also seems skeptical. “The subject is currently being intensively discussed internally,” said spokesperson Caspar Frey. So-called cloud solutions, such as ChatGPT, can only be used by retailers “with permission”, according to Frey. In addition, employees are made aware of the use of such applications. Regardless of the provider, there are fundamental security concerns when data is processed in a cloud. For example, translations of business and confidential documents are only carried out by the internal Coop language service, says Frey.
Post tinkerers with ChatGPT
Nestlé, UBS, Logitech and Swiss Re don’t even want to comment on ChatGPT. Other companies are more ambivalent. For example, pharmaceutical giant Novartis has given all employees guidelines for the responsible use of online tools such as ChatGPT. “Employees are asked not to enter any personal, business or confidential information into ChatGPT and other AI tools,” said Novartis spokesperson Satoshi Sugimoto.
It sounds similar at Lufthansa subsidiary Swiss: “The internal guidelines expressly prohibit the entry of sensitive and customer-related information,” says aviation spokesman Michael Pelzer.
Sometimes the companies are also very open to the chat robot. Of course there are instructions that you should not enter internal and confidential data outside your own system, says Post spokesman Stefan Dauner. But: “We motivate employees to try such applications to find out how they can use them to increase their own productivity and the quality of their work,” says Dauner.
To ensure that this balancing act, which is delicate in the field of data protection, succeeds, Swiss Post provides its staff with appropriate training. “We are convinced that this path makes more sense than banning new applications per se.”
Roche relies on engineering controls
It sounds similar at ABB and Roche. Artificial intelligence systems can be a useful tool for employees to create content, access information and get quick answers to their questions, says Roche spokeswoman Sileia Urech. “We are actively experimenting with the use of services such as ChatGPT, Google Bard and similar technologies.”
The pharmaceutical company also relies on guidelines in which staff are made aware of data protection issues. But of course that’s not enough: “We have put technical controls in place to prevent the accidental use of sensitive data in unauthorized tools.”
According to Isabelle Wildhaber, professor of private and corporate law at the University of St.Gallen, it took a while for Swiss companies to understand the scope of ChatGPT. “Now it seems to be clear for most of the implications that artificial intelligence can have in day-to-day work.”
« … otherwise you will lose contact »
She advocates an open approach to ChatGPT. “Blocking makes no sense, then the application will simply be used on the private mobile phone.” According to Wildhaber, training in its correct use would be much more important.
Nevertheless, guidelines are certainly needed. Because such programs use partially entered information to constantly evolve. She gives a purely theoretical example: “For example, if a Nestlé manager enters information about a new product innovation that has yet to be classified, it could appear in the response to a corresponding question from a competitor such as Unilever.” It is therefore good to be careful and handle the risks carefully. “But in the future you can’t do without it, otherwise you’ll lose contact.” (aargauerzeitung.ch)
Soource :Watson
I am Amelia James, a passionate journalist with a deep-rooted interest in current affairs. I have more than five years of experience in the media industry, working both as an author and editor for 24 Instant News. My main focus lies in international news, particularly regional conflicts and political issues around the world.
