No more orders: federal government punishes controversial IV expert

class=”sc-29f61514-0 icZBHN”>

1/5
The disability insurance (IV) no longer provides medical reports to the IV expert institute PMEDA, which has been criticized.

The federal government has instructed the IV agencies to subject the existing PMEDA reports to a new quality control.

The IV therefore complies with the recommendation of the Federal Commission for Quality of Medical Assessments (EKQMB), as the Federal Social Insurance Agency announced on Wednesday. This had revealed formal and substantive shortcomings in the PMEDA medical reports – without providing any details.

Legally binding decisions remain in force

The PMEDA previously produced bi- and polydisciplinary reports on behalf of the IV agencies, i.e. expertise with two or more medical disciplines. According to the federal government, it has not accepted any new assignments since July 1, 2023 and has canceled contracts for expert work.

More on the topic IV
Social assistance despite refusal of assessment by the IV
Federal court quashes verdict
Social assistance despite refusal of assessment by the IV
The financial control makes suggestions for improvement
Retraining using IV
The financial control makes suggestions for improvement
Disputes over childcare costs escalate
Spitex wants more money
Disputes over childcare costs escalate
“Disabled people belong to Switzerland – and to the post office”

Jobs for the disabled
“Disabled people belong to Switzerland – and to the post office”
IV will have more scope to help children with birth defects
Criteria relaxed
IV is given more leeway when it comes to helping children

The BSV wrote that all cases that are still open and ongoing through PMEDA will now be re-examined if there is no legally binding decision on benefits in the specific case. Legally binding performance decisions remained in effect.

The PMEDA currently has orders for 16 bi- and 55 polydisciplinary reports awarded before July 1. According to the BSV, these should also be checked accordingly as soon as they become available at the IV office.

Suspicion of favoritism

A year ago, Minister of Health Alain Berset stated that it was not yet advisable to suspend the contract for PMEDA. At that time, several criminal cases were already pending against the office. However, in 2020, official research showed that the agency in question met the technical requirements for carrying out IV notifications.

Advertisement

However, PMEDA has been suspected of cronyism for some time. The right to IV benefits is usually clarified on the basis of a medical report. Since 2022, expert interviews must be recorded. (SDA)

Source:Blick

follow:
Livingstone

Livingstone

I am Liam Livingstone and I work in a news website. My main job is to write articles for the 24 Instant News. My specialty is covering politics and current affairs, which I'm passionate about. I have worked in this field for more than 5 years now and it's been an amazing journey. With each passing day, my knowledge increases as well as my experience of the world we live in today.

Related Posts