IN an unfinished political philosophical editorial and childish (“naive”) about the difference between collectivism, subsidies and inequality before the law versus Freedom, individuality, humanism and fraternity, our “fellow brothers” the only Star that shines during the day on planet Earth from Panama, allowed themselves to explain the case of Milea (2023 ) in Argentina and according to the source, explained his resemblance to Adenauer (1876-1967) Germany versus Panamanian political reality including, above all, the alternative of eliminating collectivism/subsidies and giving way to individual freedom/free enterprise as the biggest social premise in a given country, in order to reduce debt and create more investment and high-performance productive jobs, through the alleged “shock therapy”, which he applied Catholic pious Konrad Adenauer more than half a century ago in Germany.
In truth, the origin of these libertarian concepts was born with LSocial liberals according to the history of political philosophy that at Saint John in Oxford (1974) we learned about Adam Smith (1723-1790) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), in the seventies of the last century. We will celebrate fifty years from the close study of Stuart Mill and Adam Smith to continue with these commandments to dream since then, that is why we have always been active on the right and we are not sorry despite the fact that we have always been tolerant towards other opponents of the ideology.
The English author (JS Mill) is one of the most influential thinkers in the history of classical liberalism. Called “the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the 19th century,” He understood freedom as the justification of individual freedom against unlimited state and social control. In his later years, while he continued to strongly defend individual rights and liberties from Avignon, France, he became more critical of economic liberalism and his views on political economy moved towards a form of liberal socialism or right-wing socioliberalism. Adenauer’s CDU man!
Let it be clear that Christian democracy never progressed in Argentina (unlike Chile and other Latin American countries), but rather a kind of radical citizenship, much more secular and closer to the presidential regime of the WDC (see DF Sarmiento 1811-1888). What does that prove? Argentina’s political DNA is very far from Germany and Adenauer and devout Catholicism, despite having a radical pope, who emerged from the Argentine absurdity and replaced another German pope, to confirm the absurdity of history.
Milei is an Ayatollah Freedom of the individual and follows more in English JS MILL qcompared to any other pro-libertarian author, and even Adenauer the Pious, something Milei may never be.
We insist! Argentinians are very far from that Germans and the rift between Argentina and Germany It is quite large even though the two countries are extraordinary and their names start with the same letter A. This does not allow us to place the two countries in the same rectangle, much less compare them or their leaders through very different and divergent paths.
In short, the extract from the editorial in question claimed that Milei would hope to plagiarize or imitate Konrad Adenauer in Germany to solve Argentina’s current problems.
According to the Star, which comes out during the day in Panama and says this: “The other thing is that Milei, a professor who has an inside track on economic theory, according to Huertas de Soto, will apply what Konrad Adenauer did in Germany after of Nazism and was to apply shock therapy, “whose first decree was to eliminate all maximum and minimum prices and all government intervention.”
First of all, Milei said that she is her alter ego Carlos Saúl Menem, Y Menem He never ruled Argentina like Konrad Adenauer between 1989-1999.
It’s true Menem is Argentine (Muslim/Catholic), and Adenauer is more than Catholic. Also, by coincidence, Milei may have won with the votes of some 2 million Menenistas and to add to the analysis, Milei chose the nephew of Carlos Saúl, deputy of La Rioja, Martín Menem to negotiate with the DNU in the deputies. Moreover, the first former American president to visit Milei was Bill Clinton, just like Carlos Menem thirty years ago. Germany and Adenauer They are not on your itinerary.
Like all leaders Latin American right, looking higher (US) and less towards Europe (Germany), because it is in their political genetics.
Miley just like Argentinians are with me, not Germans and will never be able to apply “any shock therapy” in a city that “comes from ships” according to Alberto Fernández, and which does not want to accept it because it was caused by Peronism, something that is unimaginable in Germany could one day thrive.
The Peronists never accepted the assumption “shock therapy” among many other things.
Therefore, we believe that both Star of Panama editorial, cLike the aforementioned opinion of the Spaniard Huertas de Soto, both are imprecise, even knowing that both are very close and know Milea very well, but they forgot to include the Argentinians in their analysis and Argentina itself, which is not at all similar. Germans and much less Germany and Adenauer.
Yesterday andn Provincial representatives in Buenos Airesmost approved the law in favor of Kiciloff [Kirchnerista de la kasta K], contrary to the “shock therapy” policy attributed to Milea. And look at the La Nación headline: “President accuses Buenos Aires legislators of wanting to ‘continue to maintain this impoverishing model’; the law the governor managed to pass in the legislature imposes a real estate increase of up to 200%”, contrary to the “shock therapy” attributed to Milea. CABA , December 29, 2023.
On the other hand and from the point of view constitutional political technician, Argentina is a presidential regime (tropical) pro-American (Sarmiento 1848-1888), perhaps the presidential model closest to that of the WDC in all of Latin America. While Germany is a classical Teutonic parliamentary regime (first cousin of the Saxons [“wasp”] which Argentinians do not tolerate much. All this without underestimating the very different (or antagonistic) idiosyncrasies between the Teutons and the people South Western Europe where they come from because of the ships that brought most of today’s Argentinians.
So we doubt that Teutonic “shock therapy” is the solution Solomonica for today’s Argentina (tropical)and that these are the immediate goals of the new Argentine president in his popular mandate from 2023 to 2027.
Finally, Star of Panama editorial in the skin of Madrid’s Huertas de Soto and his correlative apology, Fr “shock therapy” between Milea and Adenauer, They make us think of the recent proverb of another Spaniard like Joseph Borrell, who, when Jacques Delors died in France a few days ago, declared the Paris Panthéon European, when it was built against Europe by the French king Louis XV in 1744 during the War of the Austrian Succession , to support the Holy Empire Catholic, contrary to today’s “wokist” European.
Source: Panama America
I am David Miller, a highly experienced news reporter and author for 24 Instant News. I specialize in opinion pieces and have written extensively on current events, politics, social issues, and more. My writing has been featured in major publications such as The New York Times, The Guardian, and BBC News. I strive to be fair-minded while also producing thought-provoking content that encourages readers to engage with the topics I discuss.
