ecologists they look like communists bolsheviks in its inner essence 1 as people and movement. Communists are red and they always accepted it honestly and elegantly, because they were people who fought for their survival against inhumane and cruel capitalism.
Are environmentalists green or yellow? (they say, and so do we). They’re like avocados: they’re shiny and smart and colorful on the outside, but hollow and empty on the inside with a big dark pit in the middle, but they sure make great guacamole outside the cities, because everyone loves avocados and them their magical ideas about future and organic gastronomy.
In fact, we can find a valuable lesson from the old riddle, and it goes like this: “water passed through my house. Kate of my heart, tell me who I am? That’s what environmentalists say sell to the nation Confused and incredible mirages.
And that’s what all the litany of ecologists who want to be perfect say when they make the most mistakes. Today we will analyze two phenomena that have been troubling the planet for decades due to the misuse of populist semantics, which one is half of humanity confused even to the sages of this planet.
MILITARY NUCLEAR AND CIVIL NUCLEAR: is like comparing with Omar Torrijos Herrera and Martín Torrijos Espino. They are both Torrijos (nuclear), but although they are very similar, they are also very different at the same time. The first is military and the second civilian. The former was chosen by the Military Electoral College as leader despite the WDC’s mistake. The second was chosen in a very good fight by a civic college of hundreds of thousands of women according to RAE:1. adj. Said of a scientist: Specialized in the study of the environment. U. tcs 2. adj. Said of a 1 person: Who cares about quality and environmental protection. 3. adj. Said of study, theory, etc.: It deals with the environment. and men, etc… We prefer civilian nuclear to military of course. We are for civil peace in the world. Not because of the harsh and cruel army. The civilian Torrijos left the military Torrijos and this is the biological consequence of ancestors who Environmentalists cannot change. If they try to continue like this, they will continue to do great harm to humanity, because their fanaticism like the fanaticism of the Russian Bolsheviks is not good for the universal evolution of the Planet.
Nuclear submarine, atomic bomb, missiles with nuclear warheads etc. are military nuclear. From there came nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and to solve the electrical and comfort problems of Earthlings. As the military cell phone was created. At first it was thought yes created dangerous waves that attacked people and that’s why he kept it a secret so that after his studies he could become popular like it is today when everyone has even more than one mobile phone. Perhaps this would be the case in this century with an electro-nuclear plant for production RED HYDROGEN, even in their homes with zero radioactivity and zero carbon at the end of this century.
Only if Environmentalists are paid by the fossil energy lobby and some Machiavellian states continue to confuse you with their strange theories that change like water in a closed vessel. Recently, one of their senile leaders in Lo eres in front of the great Anglican cathedral said that CO2 is not responsible for global warming, because the Earth also produces carbon. BRILLIANT!
The second false refrain is that of RENEWABLE RESOURCES. The Spanish dictionary, which is officially prescribed by Latin American constitutions, says Fr word SOURCES of the following:1. m. Action and the effect of the appeal. 2. m. Means of any kind which, if necessary, serve to achieve what is intended. 3. m. The return or return of something to the place from which it came. 4. m. Memorial, application, written request. 5 m. right In court proceedings, a reasoned request sent to the court to make a decision on the replacement of another who is being contested. 6th floor Property, livelihood. 7th floor
A set of elements available to address the needs or conduct of a business. Natural, hydraulic, economic, human forest resources. 8th floor Files, arbitrages to exit the company with the best ratings. RAE dictionary doesn’t mention sun or wind? As for the word RENEWABLE says: 1. adj. What can be renewed? 2. adj. Said about energy: That it comes from a resource present in nature in a practically inexhaustible way. U. tcsf Increase in consumption of renewable energy sources. 3. adj. Of or relating to renewable energy. Appl. company, utcsf Renewable energy sources are asking the Government for legal certainty.
But what the planet demands from people is that they do not produce “artificial” or opposite carbon (unfair and fatal competition) to which The planet produces naturally. It does not matter if it is renewable, although the concept is advantageous. It sounds nicer. The only thing we have to limit is the excessive production of carbon dioxide or artificial or fossil CO2.
Nuclear electronics only produce water vapor. Recycle water and makes it drinkable due to high and low temperatures, and does not contaminate them, it only emits a small amount of radioactivity, which the body can tolerate scientific studies.
The problem with the three renewable sources that environmentalists have been promoting for more than half a century: water, sun and wind is that they are unstable, unreliable in the technological production chain, they are not 100% controlled by man, they depend on a large part of the nature and if they pollute.
In Hidroituang, Colombia’s largest dam, there is a reservoir that may 2 produce as much methane, perhaps as much produced by the entire MARITIME fleet world trader. It is a study that needs to be done because no one is controlling gas emissions from hydraulic reservoirs.
In addition, a recent study shows that these three sources together would not be sufficient territories, seas and airspaces on the planet meet the energy needs of all people, because they simply require spaces that the planet does not have, because its development is in this way or in spaces.
Having said that, whether they like it or not, nuclear power is the solution to achieving the goals in the near future economic revival of technological metropolises which lead us several decades ahead of peripheral countries.
It’s like both Torrijos who finally dominated them both country for almost 20 years, something that few families have managed in this way. Well, that’s how nuclear electricity is on earth for those who find it difficult to understand the subject. https://www.hidroituango.com.co 2 Last Friday, June 16, in Brussels, France, the world leader in electronuclear 3 (fission and fusion in ITER in Saint-Paul-les-Durance) succeeded in the European the law to include nuclear is officially recognized as useful for DECARBONIZATION of the planet to produce RED HYDROGEN due to its efficiency and safe and reliable stability. 18 out of 27 countries pushed this European race.
That day was written in history after more than half a century of struggle for some countries to understand that they are already a minority Europe, like Germany, Spain and others, since the European Civil Atom Group, headed by France is close have 20 partner members, including England.
Panama, for its part, has problems with water in Panama Canal, stopped exporting hydraulic energy to middle America drought of the El Niño phenomenon. It seems 4 that the time has come for Panama to ditch the shorts it has had since 1903, made of fossil water fabric, and put on solar-colored nuclear electro fabric long pants to revive its indebted economy and depressed horizon. It’s time to invent something more than a channel.
It is better to follow a leader than to oppose him, that way we will be better in the future and avoid the trial/errors that have been so difficult in the past and present. Panama must be autonomous and sovereign over all its own territory in the national energy economy.
Source: Panama America

I am David Miller, a highly experienced news reporter and author for 24 Instant News. I specialize in opinion pieces and have written extensively on current events, politics, social issues, and more. My writing has been featured in major publications such as The New York Times, The Guardian, and BBC News. I strive to be fair-minded while also producing thought-provoking content that encourages readers to engage with the topics I discuss.