Categories: World

US Supreme Court wary of major internet rule

US Supreme Court justices are showing restraint in a case that could overturn a fundamental tenet of today’s internet. It is about the scope of a US law from the 1990s, which exempts online services from liability for publishing content created by others.

The rule known as “Section 230” is considered an important protective shield against lawsuits, under which platforms such as Google, Facebook or Twitter could develop.

YouTube algorithms would have recommended IS propaganda videos

The nine Supreme Court justices held a hearing on Tuesday about a case involving Google’s video platform YouTube. It is a complaint filed by the family of an American student who died in the November 2015 terrorist attacks by the Islamic State (IS) terror militia in Paris.

She wants to hold YouTube liable because the platform’s algorithms recommended IS propaganda videos to users. In their questions to the lawyers, the judges indicated that they were quite skeptical about the position of the plaintiffs.

Judge Clarence Thomas stressed that the same algorithms are used that serve users harmless content, such as videos about preparing a rice dish. For this reason too, he could not understand the charge that the position was to assist and incite terrorism.

Plaintiff’s attorney Eric Schnapper also argued that the platform was liable because it generated the small preview images – so-called “thumbnails” – when the videos were shown. This means that YouTube itself is involved in content creation and falls outside the protective framework of Article 230, he said. Google attorney Lisa Blatt countered that the thumbnails were just recordings of videos made by others.

At the same time, the judges hinted that the use of artificial intelligence software – such as the technology behind the text engine ChatGPT on Microsoft’s search engine Bing – could change the situation for online platforms in the future. Judge Neil Gorsuch asked whether a service with text generated by such software would itself become a producer of content not covered by Section 230 protection.

(SDA)

Source: Blick

Share
Published by
Amelia

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago