KateGate: Today with the “double curls” and the “dead” Charles

There have been UFO sightings and now Kate sightings. Because if half the world has been wondering for weeks: “Where is Kate?”, there must also be people who are gradually starting to hallucinate Kate. I know this because I was one of those teenagers who in their eighties would conjure up UFOs, stare into a lit flashlight until they inevitably had UFO-like appearances, and be guaranteed to find alien footprints in the yard the next day. In any case, we found traces of aliens in a surprising number of garden beds.

I’m not surprised that someone claims to have seen Kate and William shopping for vegetables in a farm shop on March 16. She went out ‘happy, relaxed and healthy’, said reliable eyewitnesses of the ‘Sun’, illustrating this with an old but visibly happy, relaxed and healthy photo of the princess. The special thing is that no other customers of the farm shop came forward and there was no audience. Surprisingly, there are no photos because the royals asked the common people not to take any.

Others claim to have seen her on March 17, when she saw her husband and all three children playing sports.

There are two questions that Britain desperately refuses to answer. Where’s Kate? And: Who is the new Bond? Both are subject to the highest level of secrecy and rumor. The latest Bond casting rumor is: Paul Mescal. After all, all the other hot actors have already been messed up.

So if there is no answer to both questions, can’t they be related? And in reality, Kate, who seemed more at ease at the last Bond premiere than in any other public appearance, is the new Bond and is currently busy with top secret filming? Well, this statement is of course complete nonsense, but the next point is certainly not.

The photo editors of the Sunday newspaper ‘The Observer’ have taken another family photo by photographer ‘Princess of Wales’ and sent it from Kensington Palace to various agencies. Kate released it in 2023 to commemorate the late Queen’s 97th birthday.

It is said to be a very personal photo that Kate claims to have taken at Balmoral Castle on a beautiful day. It shows the Queen in an unspecified year with “some of her grandchildren and great-grandchildren”. So with some of her grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

The “Observer” was surprised because there is also a lot of “noise” in this photo, the impurities that arise when you edit an image. At least three people may have been added later.

The family photos released by the various palaces are said to have suggested authentic insights into a family that is not at all normal until now. This principle has come to an end since the edited Mother’s Day photo and this also edited large photo. And everyone wonders: what is still true about this family? Is the entire monarchy ultimately nothing more than a simulation paid for at too high a price?

Here are the details of the photo of the Queen and her privileged children:

When something curls as beautifully as Mia Tindall’s golden curls, you shouldn’t skimp on it, which was perhaps the thinking behind the most obvious flaw in this intimate family photo. Therefore, the curl now curls twice. Instead, other hairs dissolve into a beige-greenish cloud. Mia wasn’t there, she screams this arrangement at the top of her lungs.

Prince Louis’ haircut, on the other hand, definitely looks a little too sharp. Instead, a noticeable blur is visible between the sleeve of his right shirt and Isla Philipps’ hair. He may have also been smuggled into the picture afterwards.

The funny printed thing on the floor is probably a Corgy bed with a Corgy print. But what happened to the strangely fallen-looking edge of the sofa backrest?

Overall, the Queen’s couch thing is very, very suspicious. Either it has cracked open on the side and now reveals its horse brown interior. Ooor…could it be that it was never in that particular room of Balmoral Castle?

The checked pattern of Prince George’s shirt continues onto baby Lucas Tindall’s head. How is that possible? Because babies basically have transparent heads?

After it was announced in January that Kate would be back in action, sorry, resuming her public duties, at Easter, and everyone expected her to appear again at the Easter Sunday service, there is now a different definition of “Easter”. The Times wants to know that Easter is not the festival of eggs and chocolate bunnies, but rather the Easter school holidays, and that Kate does not want to appear again until these are over.

Rumors have been going around for days that the BBC is nervously awaiting an announcement from the royal family. Which the BBC neither confirms nor denies. Which of course fuels the rumors further. The illustrious conspiracy scene expects that “The king is dead, long live the king” will soon be heard throughout the country. So that it would be announced that Charles was dead and William was now in power. Diana fans in particular see this as an act of greater justice. And an OLD photo of the Buckingham Palace flag at half-mast is causing helpless confusion on social media. But where is Kate in this new, crazy obsession? WHERE IS KAAT?