Categories: Politics

Final sprint in the pension conflict

class=”sc-97fd9fa8-0 jNFKxv”>

The reform of the pension fund is about the last differences.

The reform of occupational pensions has not been settled even after the third consultation in the National Council. There is still talk about the so-called entry threshold. This states for whom a pension fund should be managed at all. It is currently on an annual salary of 22,050 francs.

The National Council first wanted to lower the threshold to CHF 12,548 and later stick to the current threshold. The Council of States wants to lower the limit to 17,640 francs, he recently confirmed. Part time and multiple employees should be better off with a discount.

The National Council now wants to pave the way for a compromise and sets the limit at CHF 19,845, as decided by 98 votes in favour, 83 against and four abstentions. With the version of the National Council, about 100,000 employees and incomes would now be compulsorily insured. With the version of the Council of States, it would be about 200,000 employees and income.

In addition to the entry threshold, the decisions of the National Council differ from the Council of States on another point. It concerns purchases in the pension funds. The National Council wants to stick to the current law.

Referendum already announced

The bill will now go back to the Council of States and is expected to be adopted by parliament on Friday. If the reform overcomes the hurdle of the final votes, the people must have the last word. Left circles have long announced a referendum against the bill.

The farmers’ union is also not satisfied with the revision. The “Fuder is overloaded,” he writes. He criticizes, among other things, the solution for the coordination deduction. According to this, eighty percent of the respective salary must always be insured in the future. The costs for agriculture are “no longer bearable”, the association complains. He therefore recommends that parliament reject the bill in the final vote.

Advertisement

The hospitality industry is also showing resistance. “The path you are now taking represents a huge additional burden of up to CHF 150 million,” Gastrosuisse warned in a letter to selected MPs. In total, the industry would have to transport an additional 250 million euros annually. “In my opinion you are going too far and the additional costs are unacceptable for many sectors of the economy,” the warning reads.

It is still unclear how the trade association will position itself. He wants to decide on Thursday where he stands on submission. (SDA/rus)

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago