Categories: Politics

Returns craze in online shopping: will we soon have to pay for returns?

class=”sc-cffd1e67-0 fmXrkB”>

1/5
The Swiss are masters at returning packages.

On Monday, the Council of States instructed the Federal Council to investigate the application of the polluter pays principle to returns in online retail. He accepted a postulate from the Commission for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy (Urek-S) by 34 votes to 8.

In concrete terms, the Federal Council should examine what legislative changes are necessary to ensure the application of the polluter pays principle for returns in online mail order companies. In addition to mandatory provisions, he must also look at financial incentives such as an incentive tax – for example in the form of an early refund compensation. The National Council rejected such a return payment in June this year.

Significant additional costs

Commission spokesperson Damian Müller (39, FDP) explained that according to a recent study, the return rate in online retail in Switzerland is 7 percent. This means that one in fourteen items is returned.

More about online shopping
“Only cares about big people”
Post terminates business package contract for online store
Discounts activate hormones
Shopping on Black Friday is “like a cocaine high”
Politicians demand change
The Federal Council must put an end to the returns craze

In individual sectors the average percentage is considerably higher, for example around 20 percent in the fashion industry. The returns would entail a lot of extra work for the providers. Individual studies have shown that Switzerland also leads Europe when it comes to returns – with a rate of 28 percent compared to 14 percent in the rest of Europe.

Free returns would create both an economic and environmental disincentive: retailers would incur additional costs as a result of the returns. From an ecological point of view, useful items that have been transported over long distances end up in the trash.

The Federal Council sees no need for action

The Federal Council had requested the rejection of the postulate. Economy Minister Guy Parmelin, 64, said he still sees no justification for such an intervention in economic freedom, as the overall ecological effects of such measures are unclear.

Advertisement

Moreover, there are already ecologically responsible incentives to avoid unnecessary travel. According to a current report from the Federal Council, there is little evidence that new non-food products are destroyed on a large scale in Switzerland. (SDA/oco)

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago