Categories: Politics

Cassis wants Hamas ban via emergency law!: What does that mean for the Turkish PKK?

class=”sc-29f61514-0 fwWrRV”>

1/5
FDP federal councilor Ignazio Cassis wants to move quickly with a ban on Hamas.
Ruedi Studer And Pascal Tischhauser

The Federal Council has become accustomed to governing during the corona pandemic. In the beginning, he put the Corona regulations into effect by means of an emergency law, the Covid legislation was rushed through parliament in an emergency procedure – and only then voted on at the ballot box.

FDP Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis (62) now also wants to push the boundaries: with a ban on Hamas through an emergency law, as the “Tages-Anzeiger” reported and various sources confirmed to Blick. “The Federal Council considers the Hamas attack to be a terrorist attack and therefore classifies Hamas as a terrorist organization,” Cassis emphasized shortly after the attack on October 7, announcing that he would consider a ban.

Meanwhile, the two security committees of the National Council and the Council of States have also spoken out in favor of banning the Palestinian Hamas organization and submitted proposals accordingly. This increases political pressure.

Why does Cassis step on the gas?

Cassis now wants to get things done quickly. According to reports, he is not only interested in sending a signal, but also in stopping Hamas propaganda or any financial flows as quickly as possible. In the currently heated atmosphere, the safety issue is also an issue.

At the same time, a special law could continue to allow diplomatic or peace policy contacts with Hamas, so that Switzerland is not automatically limited in its role as mediator.

What happened in the Federal Council?

Cassis, however, was slowed down by his companions. According to information from Blick, SP federal president Alain Berset (51) has expressed his concerns about the emergency procedure. The Federal Constitution stipulates that laws may only be promulgated urgently if their entry into force “will not tolerate any delay”.

Advertisement

The crucial question: is urgency actually justified? Would Switzerland suffer an unacceptable disadvantage if a ban on Hamas only came into effect a year later?

If there is urgency, Parliament should also give the green light. This would not be conceivable until the spring session of 2024 at the earliest. Only then can a ban come into effect and be limited in time. A possible referendum vote would only be possible afterwards.

However, under the normal procedure it would take at least until 2025 before a ban on Hamas could come into effect. Now the Federal Council must decide what pace it considers appropriate.

What impact would the accelerated procedure have?

A special Hamas law could also set a precedent. The Islamist terrorist organizations Al Qaeda and IS have been banned in Switzerland for years. However, the ban is covered by corresponding United Nations resolutions. According to the Intelligence Services Act, such a UN requirement is required for a ban on organizations.

Advertisement
More about the Hamas ban
But Berset defends himself
Cassis wants to ban Hamas through an emergency law
Rösti at a memorial service in Bern
“Israel has the right to guarantee its security”
Consequences of the decision
Switzerland should stop hugging Hamas associates
Cassis announced
Swiss killed in Hamas attack
Investigates legal options
The Federal Council wants to ban Hamas
The most important answers
What a Hamas ban in Switzerland would mean
Politicians are calling for a ban
Switzerland should take tougher action against Hamas

This is why organizations like the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in Switzerland have never been on a banned list. A Lex Hamas would therefore amount to a paradigm shift. This would quickly open the debate on quickly declaring other groups in question illegal. The pressure on Switzerland to impose bans would increase enormously.

Ban not actually disputed

The Hamas ban could still be on the table at one of the next Federal Council meetings, as the ban itself is not up for discussion. It was a kind of first reading, they say in Bern. Apparently the tight schedule due to Macron’s visit also meant that not all questions could be clarified.

If the Federal Council actually decides to urgently declare Hamas an illegal terrorist organization, the discussion about the emergency law and the lack of respect for constitutional customs by our state government will inevitably erupt again.

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago