class=”sc-29f61514-0 icZBHN”>
The timing couldn’t be worse: on Thursday, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (65) will receive the Emir of Qatar, Tamim bin Hamid al Thani (43). A few days after Hamas’ brutal terrorist attack on Israel, the red carpet was rolled out in Berlin for one of the terrorists’ top donors. German media headlines: “Scholz welcomes top sponsor of terror.”
Similar questions also arise in Switzerland. The Federal Council decided on Wednesday to ban the radical Islamist Hamas as a terrorist organization – a move called for by Israeli representatives and politicians from all parties.
But Switzerland has had good relations for decades with its donors, especially Qatar and Iran, which pump hundreds of millions into the Gaza Strip and Hamas every year. In the case of Iran, the protective power mandate for the US is particularly important; in the case of Qatar, these are Switzerland’s tangible economic interests.
Wouldn’t a ban on Hamas also mean distancing ourselves from its financiers? Yes, says Jonathan Kreutner (44), secretary general of the Swiss Association of Jewish Communities (SIG). Banning Hamas is a first step. “But Switzerland should also question its lax attitude towards regimes like Iran,” he demands. “Switzerland is too cautious in condemning its blatant human rights violations and anti-Semitism. Switzerland must find a clearer way to deal with this regime.”
Kreutner finds support from Hans-Peter Portmann (60), vice-chairman of the National Council for Foreign Policy Committee. “We cannot continue to support states like Syria, Lebanon and Qatar that finance this terror,” Zurich’s National FDP Council said. He put this question on the agenda for Monday’s committee meeting.
The FDP National Council believes that the mandate of the protective power in Iran itself should be questioned. “If it is not possible to use the mandate to stop this terrorist financing, we should consider giving up the mandate of the protective power.”
Foreign politician Elisabeth Schneider-Schneiter (59) sees things very differently. “The question of how to deal with such third countries can arise in many conflicts.” The national councilor of the Basel Center rejects sanctions or the like. It seems more important to her to continually raise the issue of Iran’s problematic financing within the framework of the protective power mandate. “Also in the case of Qatar, it is more productive to place our values within the framework of diplomatic and economic contacts.”
Contacts with Qatar are “excellent”, as the Swiss ambassador in Doha, Edgar Döring, said a year ago. You can also do lucrative business with the Gulf State.
Given Qatar’s economic importance, it is not surprising that former Minister of Finance and former Minister of Defense Ueli Maurer (72) had particularly close relations with Qatar. He visited the state several times, even his last official trip was to Doha where he attended the Switzerland-Brazil World Cup match.
But the Qataris are also interested in doing business with Switzerland: they invested five percent in Credit Suisse and held shares in commodities giant Glencore. And Switzerland is negotiating to buy liquefied gas from Qatar. Another industry that attracts Qataris is tourism: years ago, the Qatari sovereign wealth fund bought luxury hotels such as the Schweizerhof in Bern and the Bürgenstock Resort on Lake Lucerne for a total of almost a billion Swiss francs.
And here too Maurer helped: When the Qataris on the Bürgenstock could not rent out their apartments and therefore wanted to sell them to rich foreigners, Maurer is said to have personally argued for an exception to the Lex Koller on the “Bürgenstock”.
When it comes to Iran, Switzerland’s economic interests are less important. The trade volume in 2022 amounted to only 163 million francs, which is also due to the international sanctions against the mullah regime. It is virtually impossible for a Swiss company to find a bank willing to finance possible business activities related to Iran.
Diplomatic dialogue is more important. Switzerland has several protective power mandates with Iran. As such, as part of its good offices, it represents the interests of foreign states – such as those of Iran in Egypt and Canada and those of the US in Iran. These “good offices” are not entirely altruistic. Switzerland’s diplomatic commitment should lead to more stability in the Middle East. But the federal government is also hoping for privileged access to various governments, which could one day pay off.
Source:Blick
I am Liam Livingstone and I work in a news website. My main job is to write articles for the 24 Instant News. My specialty is covering politics and current affairs, which I’m passionate about. I have worked in this field for more than 5 years now and it’s been an amazing journey. With each passing day, my knowledge increases as well as my experience of the world we live in today.
On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…
At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…
The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…