Optional options

A political panorama that seems cloudy. Very cloudy. Apart from being superficial and banal. All candidates are involved in the perverse agenda of globalism and Agenda 20/30.

Although government and state programs are defined at each election tournament, which are developed for a period of about five (5) years, those who appear in the political arena are not perceived favorably by others. the generality of the Panamanian people. People who do not identify with partisan colors, and even less with the slogans of groups. This is the people who remain, perhaps, silent, observing, but who listen, think, meditate and draw their own conclusions.

Spectrum of options: A government candidate who does not convince and who drags the incompetence of the government to which he belongs and who, as the second most important person at the top of the political power, delivers a speech to the people that cannot help but sympathize with or adapt to the realities and shortcomings of this government, which is accused of allegedly increases the public debt, with special reference to the fact that indebted, in billions and billions of dollars to the nationwith serious consequences for the population, and that, on the other hand, at the level of social reality, those billions of dollars are not visible, on the contrary, there is a lack and absence of investments or, at least, the few works that exist, their amounts do not translate into the amounts that are said to are invested.

The millionaire loans that this government has taken are constant and they are burying us in a criminal debt every day, in the repayment of which all Panamanians contribute. More than five billion a year are allocated from the general budget of the nation to pay the debt according to international financial organizations (IFIS).

And from this painful and humiliating situation, unworthy of a nation, few of us came out condemn and criticize this irresponsible management of public finances.

And added to this, as given I know after the recent news, tax collection The latter had a deficit exceeding two hundred and fifty million dollars.

A lot could be said candidate of the ruling party. But it should be understood that the attack is not subjective, on the contrary, it is objective. The fatal shadow of darkness and the incompetence of his own government lands him on the scaffolding of electoral frustration and predicts him significant social, popular rejection or rejection. For sure, If there had been a good government, that of Nita Cortiz, the official candidate would have failed in terms of the sympathies of the electorate, but that is not the case.

The political scenario is not simple. AND the presidential candidate, who was already the president of the country, Martin Torrijos It is presented to the electorate as a political option. A PRD member by life history and his own beliefs, he was nominated by a small party that has never been an example of support from the electorate. And that’s it: a little game. With the assembly that nominates him rickety and poor, he remains just another candidate. This situation is common for other candidates who They jumped from their political canopies that they now call themselves “independent” but whose roots or political matrix are still those of their parties. I hope the electorate will open their eyes and see this in a brighter light. The pure story that they renounced the parties that, practically, saw them born or sheltered and put to sleep, from of political birth, with blankets and in the cradles of those parties.

Those divorces are weird. Well, the same political affairs continue, with the same people and the same ideology.

The candidate with the umbilical cord of the revolutionary party, who no longer has anything of a revolutionist, is trying to win the vote of the PRD and gather the masses tormented by uncertainty, although he does not say so. The same is claimed by those who call themselves “independent”have drawn faces of the leaders of those parties: Omar Torrijos H. and Arnulfo Arias M.

in the political career also represents the former president Martinelliwhich, according to polls, attracts a high percentage of the electorate, and which, on the other hand, has the obvious hostility of those disobedient sectors of Creole politics and the rotten Panamanian oligarchy, as well as towards its own candidate and of the same social and economic lineage, already defeated in the last elections by electricity ruler, and amen to the business class, because they do not forgive candidate Martinelli for his growing populist agenda and for setting the tone of government with his famous expressions: “Walking in shoes of the people”, “Simply in your pocket” or “Chen chen in your wallet”.

A candidate who is hated by the economic power elites and who have severe and terrifying nightmares with this candidate who is sweeping the polls and who, insiders claim, is held to a criminal conviction that, constitutionally, after executionit would prevent him from continuing the electoral tournament.

The legal diatribe is interesting: on the one hand, the Criminal Code cancels the presidential race of the man whom the people, according to polls, want in political power for the next five years, and on the other hand, the impact of that fact on democracy.

The question remains to be answered regarding candidate Martinelli: was the sentence imposed before or after he was nominated as a presidential candidate? If it was later, his expedition, as it should constitutional obstacle provided for in 180 Magna Carta? Although the norm does not prescribe differences, it is a matter of pure constitutional hermeneutics. How was he considered the official candidate of one party, knowing that criminal proceedings are underway? How to resolve these antinomies of constitutional, political and legal values?

I think there is a lot of fabric to cut. For now, I am leaning towards the favorable constitutional interpretation projected in favor of the current candidate. The realization of the political rights of prisoners does not prevent him, for a day general elections, exercise your right to vote. How would it be understood in the case of Martinelli?

Deprived of freedom by voting and unable to be elected?

Let’s leave it there. To be continued. God bless the country!