Hijacking of the Panama Papers

In the 21st century, it is impressive that they have he published a judicial gag in a Panamanian newspaper in a candid relationship directly with the concealment of data on beneficiaries of economic support, suggesting to people the possible revival of some kind of soft Panamanian dictatorship. These actions are contrary to human rights, which require states to adopt measures to prohibit direct or indirect restrictions on freedom of expression. Current discrimination The State of Panama in the distribution of public funds intended for advertising and/or spreading their propaganda; and the court processes brought by different media create a monopoly over information, limiting pluralism and diversity as essential factors of freedom of expression.

Article 6 UNESCO’s General Declaration on Cultural Diversityaccording to which it is state They must ensure that all cultures can be expressed and published. Freedom of expression, pluralism media, equal access to artistic expressionsS, scientific and technological knowledge and the possibility, for all cultures, to be present in the media of expression and dissemination, are the guarantors of cultural diversity.

A democratic society without access to various sources of information is not free society, nor does it allow Panamanians they have the tools to consolidate their rights. The media must to develop freely, without illegitimate pressures from any sector and without the possibility of establishing direct or indirect mechanisms, such as account hijacking or eternal trials with the powerful judge of the state.

There is no need for a soft dictatorship in 2024 the bloodthirsty violence of CODEPADI in the eighties, nor the battalion and much less the varilleros of the Civilian Crusade in protests for the monopolization of media power. Now working with a “bureaucratic elite of circular clientelism” based in the Palacio de la 5 de Mayo and emulating the Supreme Court of Hugo Chávez Frías, they use creole courts and courts of justice exercise power control. The autocrats understood their role very well It means defending your election candidates at all costs, no matter how dishonest and immoral their statements are, no matter how disastrous their influence on the Panamanian people.

One might think that electricity the advisers are the sons of Aleksandar Dugin and Norbert Ceresole; and they are led by an Andorran student of István Mészáros, repeating the gag of those countries where they hijack and polarize journalistic pluralism through Contemporary Bolshevik one-party state. The current one-party Panamanian state is Leninist, it is anti-meritocratic, a country run by those who hand out economic aid to their children, build and equip hospitals for their campaign donors, and retain ministers of state not for their ability, but for their loyalty..

In the Bolshevik imagination, only the press could be free, and public institutions They could only be honest, when they were always controlled by the party. The radical left is not on the streets and disrupting Panamanian traffic, it is in the budget committee thinking about its eternal continuity.

Public criticism was considered a fundamental weapon for questioning power omnipotent and repressive State. From then until today, institutional and legal art has been built on the basis of defending against the arbitrariness of the state and governments and limiting their ability to violate freedom of expression. I hope our Panamanian rulers are reading the Bible in Proverbs 11:13. Where there is no wise direction, men will fall; More in multitude of advisors there is security.