There will always be a man and a woman

There is nothing new under the sun. What is has already been and what will be has already been. Past, present and future seem to be lost in this statement of the wise Solomon, and this is reflected in the Book Ecclesiastes or the Book of Wisdom. This is stated in chapter 1, verses 9 to 11: “What has been? The same will be. What has been done? The same will be done and there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything that can say, Behold, is this new? It was already in the centuries that preceded us. There is no memory of what has gone before, nor of what will happen, there will be no memory in those who will be after.” Nothing is new.

This thought is categorical. It’s paremia. A paremia is usually defined as a statement, sentence, or phrase, generally of a witty or profound type, that invites the reader to think about a matter of a moral or intellectual nature. The term is of Greek origin and consists of the words para- “beside” or “along”) and hear (“path”, “path”), therefore, from the beginning it alluded to the things said in manner, colloquial, things usually said popularly.

They can be spontaneous and popular (anonymous, like proverbs), or cult and literary uses (with an author, like proverbs and aphorisms). In the case of a biblical quote, it is attributed to the King and the Wise Solomon. Paremiology is said to be yes takes care of study paremies, to expose its meaning and scope, to penetrate its meaning, to protect its scope. It should not be confused with hermeneutics, since it is responsible for the interpretation of norms in general, although we could rightly claim that paremies to a certain extent indicate or define a guideline or a norm of life with their content. They have as paremies: Sayings, proverbs, adages, maxims, sentences, dialogisms, apothegms, aphorisms and many other types of similar texts.

since ancient times, which is views in Greek antiquity, the first philosophers dealt with concepts such as change, motion and knowledge. But they realized that movement and change are the same, like synonyms. Among the Ionian philosophers, Heraclitus so-called stands out Dark and Parmenides. The first of them claimed that everything changes, nothing remains the same, that there is no possibility of it being immutable, but that everything, absolutely everything, mutates in its space and time.

“No one bathes more than once in the same water of the river,” said Heraclitus, explaining that the same water did not flow when the second bath was attempted and that whoever tried to do it a second time, it shouldn’t be the same either.

The waters in which he bathed for the first time had already flowed, passed, so that the current flowing in the river brings new waters and, secondly, whoever bathes a second time is not the same person. She was already older, even by seconds, and in her there were also changes in her thinking, in her behavior, in her movements.

Parmenides contradicts Heraclitus and claims that no change or mutation is possible. Nothing sticks. Everything is a unity that remains unchanged. There seems to be a meeting point between Parmenides and Solomon in this according to the biblical quote already presented.

But who do we trust? Heraclitus or Parmenides?. In my opinion, Heraclitus is not without reason. Neither will it be the same water nor will it be the same person repeatedly trying to bathe in what they assume or believe to be the same river water. But, in the same sense, Parmenides is also not without reason: That being is immutable, nothing changes, change is not possible. The only thing that remains is the being, the essence. The Ionians, let’s remember, were concerned with finding the arjé – essence or substance – of things, an extreme and radical explanation of every object or phenomenon.

So, from the biblical premise, with which they are according to philosophy and biology, A human being is an essence, and that essence is determined, with regard to his condition as male or female, without any other qualification, as an immutable matter, impossible of any variation, even when physical changes are adopted or the human being is perceived as something other than that which he essentially is. The essence of man, read carefully, cannot mutate, cannot change, because in strict and deep paremia it is what it always was and will be what it already was: Man or woman. Neither time nor space will be able to change that essence.

Water rivers to which referred to by Heraclitus will never cease to be water and a human being He will never stop being that: a human being. It will always be the human species. Although they want to impose new paradigms on us in order to imagine the human being, let us be clear that they have proven to be false and contradictory, just as they are also impossible to maintain before the Great Logos: Universal Creator God and Author of everything that surrounds us. God bless the country!