class=”sc-29f61514-0 fQbOYE”>
When we still lived in the desert, we anxiously watched the horizon. We wanted to know if a lion was chasing us. Today we carry the horizon in our trouser pockets. It has dwindled to a digital interface that we dig about 200 times a day. The outside world has become a virtual movie – the small screen is the real thing that absorbs our attention. And we are still looking for dangers: we are looking for the actual tension on the screen.
Oppression. Exploitation. Accidents of all kinds. Crimes. climate apocalypse. End of the world, the rise of evil. Why are we doing this voluntarily?
The German thinker Peter Sloterdijk formulated a theory suitable for the media age. Modern media do not primarily provide information, but produce stress. They present the audience with a range of arousal offerings to choose from. It is only through stress that something like a thematic connection and thus the cohesion of a modern, individualized large society arises.
Of course, societies, in turn, constantly complain in the media about the stress they are subjected to. But at the same time, they need it in order to function at all. They depend on the creators of the media, modern stress blowers. According to Sloterdijk, “Sometimes the journalist himself can be successful as an incentive if he brings up the subject first, but in terms of his job profile, he’s basically a fellow swimmer in worlds of excitement.”
Sloterdijk’s theory of media has a double meaning: firstly, the actual tension, which brings society into a state of excitement, performs a coherent-forming function. And secondly, the media form a system that is prone to selfishness. They report primarily not about what is, but about what others report. The causative agents of the topic constantly watch each other suspiciously. That’s why everyone writes the same thing about the same thing. And for the same reason, they conduct phantom debates, which are primarily of interest to themselves and politicians like them.
Ordinary media users are surprised by the uniformity of coverage. But there is no big thematic master plan developed by the mastermind. Just a media bubble with everyone looking at each other suspiciously. The creators of the media stress us because we want to be stressed. The stress of questions produces a tense society. In other words, a society that would otherwise not be. Fine
René Scheuil is a philosopher and director of the Swiss Institute for Economic Policy (IWP) in Lucerne. He writes to Blick every second Monday.
Source: Blick
I am David Miller, a highly experienced news reporter and author for 24 Instant News. I specialize in opinion pieces and have written extensively on current events, politics, social issues, and more. My writing has been featured in major publications such as The New York Times, The Guardian, and BBC News. I strive to be fair-minded while also producing thought-provoking content that encourages readers to engage with the topics I discuss.
On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…
At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…
The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…