Was Prince Harry a victim of his mobile phone being hacked?

Prince Henry, the youngest son of Britain’s King Charles III, was the victim of the hacking of his mobile phone by the tabloids of the Mirror group, for which he must receive compensation of 140,600 pounds (about 163,096 euros), the judge of the High Court in London ruled this Friday.

Judge Timothy Fancourt indicated that the Duke of Sussex’s personal phone had been hacked between 2003 and 2009 and that 15 of the 33 articles about his life had been written on the basis of wiretapping information.

The Duke of Sussex, son of Charles III and the late Diana of Wales, has launched legal action against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), accusing them of engaging in shady practices such as illegal wiretapping to obtain information and sell it. the newspaper.

The articles “were the result of wiretapping, or a product of another collection of illegal information,” said the judge, who admitted that the amount of damages was modest but reflected the harm the Prince had suffered as a result of the Mirror’s actions.

“I noticed that 15 of the 33 rated articles were products hacking your mobile phone or the mobile phones of his associates, or the product of other illegal data collection. “I think his phone was only hacked in a modest way and he was probably closely monitored by certain people in all the newspapers,” he added.

“However, since then it has happened occasionally from the end of 2003 to April 2009 (the date of the last article I reviewed). “In his evidence, the Duke was inclined to assume that everything published was the product of voicemail interception because phone hacking was widespread at the Mirror Group at the time,” the judge noted.

After learning about the verdict, a spokesperson for MGN dthey said they “welcome today’s ruling, which gives the company the clarity it needs to move forward regarding events that took place years ago. When historic wrongdoing occurred, we apologized unreservedly, took full responsibility and paid appropriate compensation.”

Last June, the prince, who lives in NOWappeared as a witness in court, to which he stated that the tabloid’s actions to obtain exclusives caused “paranoia” and “distrust” and had an impact on “all areas” of his life, from safety to relationships.

The MGN group publishes the newspapers “Sunday Mirror”, “Daily Mirror” and Sunday People”, and the lawsuit covered the period from 1995 to 2011, when numerous details from his life, allegedly obtained illegally, were published.

The prince’s court appearance attracted widespread media attention as he was the first member of the British royal family in more than a hundred years to testify in person before a British court.

The prince even accused the tabloids of beingr “incited hatred and harassment” in his private life in a written document.

The Mirror Group’s lawyers, for their part, described the allegations as “exaggerated” and that the evidence presented did not show a single instance of hacking.