Categories: World

“Meta exchanges one illegal practice for another illegal practice”

The Facebook group is changing the basis for personalized advertising in Europe. “Facebook fright” Max Schrems is not satisfied.

The Facebook group Meta will offer its users in Europe the opportunity to object to the collection of information about their online behavior for the purpose of personalizing ads.

Meta has not voluntarily changed the legal basis for data collection. The previous practice was declared illegal by the responsible Irish data protection authority early this year. The switch will go into effect on April 5, according to a blog post on Thursday.

Meta does not want to collect the data in the future on the basis of a contractual agreement with the users, but claims a “legitimate interest” in doing so. This change also gives you the opportunity to object to the collection of data. That’s not enough for critics (see below).

Personalized advertising is one of the main pillars of the business model of the two major meta-social media platforms, Facebook and Instagram.

“Profiling and tracking on the scale of Meta cannot possibly outweigh the fundamental rights of those affected.”

Well-known critic: ‘Too little’

For the European data protection organization Noyb, whose complaints made an important contribution to the decision of the Irish data protection activists, the change falls short. “Meta exchanges an illegal practice for another illegal practice,” criticized Noyb founder Max Schrems, who, as a young law student, battled the American tech company’s rampant data collection and is considered a “Facebook scare”.

The European non-profit organization states that instead of being able to “opt-out” of data collection, prior “opt-in” consent is required. Noyb will take immediate action against the new model. For strategic reasons, no details are yet to be announced.

390 million euros fine

In January, Irish privacy lawyers found a violation of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and imposed a fine of 390 million euros on Meta.

Meta emphasized on Thursday that the group still believes it has acted within the framework of the GDPR. The appeal against the decision will therefore continue. However, the amendment aims to meet the requirements of data protection officers within a certain period of time.

Since 2018, the GDPR has regulated the conditions under which personal data may be used. At that time, the Facebook group had stated in its terms of use that personalized advertising was part of the service, which did not require separate consent.

Sources

(dsc/sda/awp/dpa)

Soource :Watson

Share
Published by
Amelia

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago