Categories: World

Remarkable verdict: American judge finds clear words for Trump Anti-Semitism scandal involving Elon Musk: this is how the White House responds

Former US President Donald Trump has won a legal victory ahead of the 2024 elections, but the verdict is a clear condemnation of his actions.

In view of the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, Judge Sarah Wallace writes in her ruling:

“The court concludes that Trump acted with the specific intent to incite political violence against the Capitol to disrupt the certification of the election results.”

With his speech at the time, the Republican called for “immediate lawless violence.” His words and behavior were the “real cause” of the storming of the Capitol.

What was it about?

Why did Trump win the trial despite these clear words? The background is that several plaintiffs in several US states are trying to remove Trump’s name from ballots for the 2024 presidential election. They are calling for a constitutional amendment that would ban people from elections who incited an “insurrection” against the Constitution.

They already failed in the states of Michigan and Minnesota – now also in Colorado on Friday evening (local time). Judge Wallace concluded that the clause explicitly does not refer to the presidency — and therefore Trump can remain on the ballot for the state’s Republican primary.

Trump supporters stormed the Houses of Parliament in Washington on January 6, 2021. Congress met there to formally confirm Democrat Joe Biden’s victory in the presidential election. Trump had previously incited his supporters during a speech.

Five people were killed as a result of the riots. Trump, who wants to return to the White House after the 2024 elections, is charged at federal level with, among other things, attempted election fraud. The 77-year-old is accused, among other things, of conspiracy against the United States.

What does this judgment mean?

The ruling from Colorado is not binding on the trial that will take place in Washington next year. It wasn’t a criminal case either.

Yet it is significant that a judge comes to such a clear condemnation of Trump’s behavior in light of the events of January 6, 2021.

And in her ruling, Wallace also rejects the ex-president’s defense that his speech was merely free speech. Trump’s lawyers also argue this in the federal proceedings.

(dsc/sda/dpa)

Soource :Watson

Share
Published by
Amelia

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago