Categories: Technology

This Ukraine expert explains what is really behind the counter-offensive

American ‘war scientist’ Jennifer Cafarella analyzes very sharply what we should think of the Ukrainian counter-offensive and why certain military experts are wrong.
Daniel Schurter

If you want to be up-to-date and extensively informed about the war in Ukraine, that is impossible Institute for the Study of War (ISW) about.

The ISW’s daily situation reports have been required reading for journalists since the beginning of the Russian invasion, but are also closely studied in secret service and government circles.

One of the brightest minds of the American think tank is Jennifer Cafarella. The 30-year-old wrote razor-sharp geopolitical security analyzes on Putin and the Syrian war before she and her team focused on Ukraine.

On Monday, Cafarella gave a current assessment of the Ukrainian counter-offensive on the online platform X. According to the Watson editor, the American analyst’s statements, translated into German, are also interesting for people who do not have to deal with the war in Ukraine on a daily basis, but who can appreciate an expert opinion.

One thing is becoming clearer the longer it goes on: the pro-Russian disinformation campaigns, funded by Vladimir Putin, are reaching a disturbing number of people. It is all the more important to counter this with expert assessments that are based on reliable sources and facts.

On site and on Telegram
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) became Founded in 2007 by American military historian Kimberly Kagan, in response to the stagnation of the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Based in Washington DC, the nonprofit organization employs a team of professionals who work according to scientific standards and evaluate primary and secondary sources. Its stated purpose is to provide real-time analysis of ongoing military operations and military conflicts.

ISW reports are freely accessible to anyone interested. To so-called Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) To operate, ISW people speak the languages ​​of the parties to the conflict, conduct on-site research, communicate with informants and evaluate online sources. In addition to the major American social media platforms, the messaging service Telegram with its public channels is extremely important: statements by Russian state representatives and military bloggers can be evaluated there, and the Ukrainian army and state leadership also use Telegram for information and propaganda purposes.

And the financing? The ISW describes itself as an impartial organization. They rely solely on private donations and do not accept money from the US government or foreign countries.

“If the Russians fail to stem the growing momentum, the Ukrainian breakthrough could be swift and far-reaching.”

The following is primarily about Cafarella’s explanation of how military operations can be assessed. If you don’t have time for this, it’s best to skip to point 4.

How do you assess the success of a military operation?

Cafarella explains:

“Assessing the ultimate success or failure of a major military operation requires multiple perspectives. Most importantly, we take into account the effects achieved on the battlefield and weigh these against the desired outcome (or ‘goal’ in military terms).

We also need to understand a few things about the design of the operation itself. In this case the bottom line is that it is still too early to speak of a victory, but certainly too early to speak of a defeat. The fight has begun.

First, it is important to convey some basic principles of war science. Operations such as those carried out by Ukraine take place at the so-called operational level – between the tactical level (think of troops in combat contact) and the strategic level (think of ultimate war objectives).

What distinguishes Ukrainian warfare from Russian warfare?

Cafarella says:

“Analysing the operational level of war is a fascinating and challenging discipline. Especially when an army has operational leaders who can design, monitor, and orchestrate operations into campaigns with a skill that goes beyond the hard science of people and equipment.

Yes, art. It’s a strange word in a military context, but it applies. While there is much we publicly don’t know about how things are planned, directed, and managed, Ukraine’s war effort shows signs of artistry.

This is not the case with Russia.”

Why are many skeptical ‘military experts’ wrong?

The ISW analyst explains:

“Although this war has been going on for far too long from a human perspective, Ukraine is still in the early stages of its deliberate counter-offensive. That’s because the Russians had ample time to build a deep, multi-layered defense. So this operation is not the ‘end game’, which is another tragedy for Ukraine, which will have to deal with this for many months to come.

Ultimately (strategically speaking), Ukraine’s main goal is the liberation of its entire territory and population.

Considering the situation on the battlefield at the time when Ukraine launched its current offensive, even with skill it was not possible to achieve this goal in one go.

Therefore, those who assess Ukraine’s recent progress based on its strategic objective rather than a nested/supporting operational objective err in military analysis.

Ukraine cannot regain all its territory in one operation. A judgment based on this false basis has no analytical value.”

Is the counter-offensive a success?

Cafarella warns against too much optimism:

It is still too early for a definitive answer. But the signs currently indicate that the offensive is working as planned and gaining momentum, meaning it is certainly too early to call it a failure.

Ukrainian forces have broken through the first layers of Russian defenses on the Zaporizhia front, forcing the Russians to make increasingly difficult decisions, especially between Bakhmut and Zaporizhia.

What does Ukraine want to achieve with the counter-offensive?

The American scientist said:

“With this offensive, Ukraine is pursuing a goal that is far from achieving all its strategic war objectives. From the public statements and planning of this operation we can conclude that the aim is probably, broadly speaking, to disrupt the Russian supply line to Crimea and achieve a penetration of Russian defense lines that would allow a subsequent ‘exploitation phase’ .

The actual objective (classified as secret) will be more specific and likely also take into account the inevitable need to develop plans as the fighting progresses.”

Why is the situation difficult for Russia?

Cafarella asks rhetorically:

«Can the Russians stabilize it? We shall see. But the ISW further noted that Russia not only lacks reserves, but forces in general to maintain the same manning levels of the defense lines several shifts back. So maybe not.

In other words, the deeper it goes, the easier it will be for Ukraine.

This means that we cannot project linearly. If the Russians fail to stop the growing momentum, the Ukrainian breakthrough could be swift and far-reaching.”

Why is the Western desire for negotiations so dangerous?

As a reminder, Putin does not want to negotiate, but wants to destroy Ukraine by military means. As we know since the failed invasion in February 2022, Russia’s commander-in-chief is often wrong. But this should in no way lead to Russia being underestimated. Or, as has been heard more often in Western government circles recently, the insistence on a negotiated solution.

Cafarella explains:

“It remains entirely possible that Ukraine will actually achieve a complete and profound breakthrough, which will unbalance Russia’s defenses in the south and allow Ukraine to cut the supply line to Crimea and gain significant territory in the process. to transport. This can then lead to even more being achieved in a new exploitation phase.

The fact that these outcomes are entirely possible means that it is premature to pressure Ukraine for concessions and negotiations now.

In fact, this would directly benefit Russia, which desperately needs time and space to regroup and try to gather more men and equipment to stabilize its defenses.

Are these the only outcomes that are completely possible? Of course not. It is war.”

What happens next on the battlefield?

No one knows at this point because the course of the military conflict depends on many factors, many of which are not publicly known.

Cafarella points out:

“The [Gegenoffensive der] Ukraine could falter. Russia was able to regroup successfully. Russia could sacrifice ground elsewhere and try to sustain smaller losses to free up troops to fill the gaps in the south. Etc. The point is that there are still many battles left and it is too early to say how this round will end, let alone the war. We are not yet in the ‘end game’.

Much fighting remains, but events so far suggest that the design of the Ukrainian offensive could prove to be one of these examples of artistry.

Ukraine has made some risky but excellent decisions. Their bitter resistance in Bakhmut not only cost the Russians significant costs but also contributed to Wagner’s downfall. It also directly supported the breakthrough of Russian lines in southern Ukraine by tying down troops that Russia can practically spare.

Sources

  • twitter.com: Topic by Jennifer Cafarella
  • understandwar.org: Website about ISW research activities
  • cnn.com: On GPS: Russian victory far from guaranteed
  • wikipedia.org: Institute for the Study of War

Daniel Schurter

Source: Watson

Share
Published by
Ella

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago