Categories: Politics

Expert criticizes facial recognition plans at Fedpol

class=”sc-3778e872-0 cKDKQr”>

1/5
A look at the Fedpol emergency center: the Federal Bureau wants to use facial recognition again.

The federal detectives are arming themselves. The Federal Bureau of Police (Fedpol) now wants to use facial recognition to convict criminals. Images from, for example, a security camera must now be comparable to the database of the police. Today, Fedpol can only search the database for fingerprints and names. A month ago, the Federal Council approved CHF 25 million for the new system.

But now there are doubts about the legality of the venture. Monika Simmler, assistant professor of criminal justice at the University of St Gallen, told the newspapers “CH Media” that facial recognition is a serious violation of fundamental rights. Because personal data are processed that deserve special protection.

Parliament must have a say

“A general ordinance-level authorization is not enough for this,” says Simmler, who specializes in the subject. On the contrary, the relevant law should be changed. She also puts forward a democratic-political argument for this: in contrast to an amendment to a regulation, the Bundesrat cannot only decide on a legislative amendment, but the parliament decides. And in a possible referendum, the voters have the last word.

Simmler is an SP cantonal councilor in St. Gallen. Against this background, their position is not surprising.

Fedpol admits mistakes

However, she is not the only expert to criticize. In particular, the fact that the Federal Council claimed in the press release about the new system that there was no facial recognition, caused irritation among lawyers. And that this is prohibited in Switzerland anyway. Instead of facial recognition, the federal government prefers to speak of “face image matching”.

“How the Federal Council came up with the idea that facial recognition is legally prohibited in Switzerland is a mystery,” writes lawyer Martin Steiger, who specializes in digital law, in his blog.

Advertisement

Fedpol now admits to “CH Media” that the wording is incorrect. It is true that facial recognition is only allowed if there is a legal basis for it.

Facial recognition must be used from 2026. What is controversial in Switzerland is already established in many other countries. Germany, for example, has been using such a system since 2008. (lha)

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago