Categories: Politics

Electric heaters may be banned

class=”sc-3778e872-0 cKDKQr”>

The federal court has ruled that electric heaters may be banned.

2030 should be the end: from then on electric heaters are banned in the canton of Zurich. And that’s legal, according to the Federal Supreme Court. Two people went to court because they did not want to accept that they would have to replace their working electric heaters with a more energy-efficient solution in seven years’ time.

They argued that the new energy law would force them to pay for a replacement and would face a fine of up to CHF 20,000 if violated. However, the Federal Supreme Court has clearly rejected their complaint, as evidenced by a verdict published Thursday.

Legitimate Interference with Property Warranty

According to the Federal Supreme Court, the obligation to remove existing electrical heating appliances is of course already an infringement of property, but in the present case this is justified and reasonable, as the judgment states.

For example, the ban on electric heaters serves the protection of the environment and an adequate energy supply, or several overriding interests, write the country’s highest judges. Because: “Electric heaters have a shortfall in the efficiency of electricity consumption.” There are energetically better alternatives for heating buildings, such as pellet and district heating and heat pumps.

“Logical step”

Moreover, the criticized ban is not unexpected for the owners, the federal judges continue to say in the ruling. As early as 1990, the federal government issued a strict permit requirement for electric heaters and since 2013 they are only permitted to a limited extent as emergency heaters in the canton of Zurich. The deadline now set to replace all electric heaters in 2030 “is a logical next step”.

According to the ruling, installations built without a permit before 1991 will probably have reached the end of their lifespan in 2030 and will in any case need to be replaced. The Federal Supreme Court thus supports the new Zurich energy law in principle. Whether compensation for expropriation is possible in individual cases must then be determined on a case-by-case basis, it is said. (SDA)

Advertisement

(judgment 1C_37/2022 of 23 March 2023)

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago