Categories: Politics

Ethics Committee opposes genetic engineering

The Federal Ethics Committee examined the extent to which genetic engineering can contribute to reducing greenhouse gases.

The use of genetic engineering is a hot topic in Swiss politics. Switzerland has banned genetic engineering in agriculture for 16 years. But now Parliament wants to relax this ban. The so-called Crispr/Cas gene scissors should be approved in the future because there are fewer risks with such new genetic engineering methods. The Federal Council must prepare a design for a corresponding model by mid-2024 at the latest.

The Federal Ethics Commission does not think this is a good idea. New genetic engineering methods such as Crispr/Cas would not make a significant contribution to the adaptation of Swiss agriculture to climate change, the committee writes in a report presented Monday.

Genetic engineering brings too little

A clear majority of the Commission believes that in the short time available it is “quite unlikely” that the new genetic engineering processes can make a decisive contribution to securing or increasing crop yields.

The Crispr/Cas method can be used to precisely modify the genome of cells. For example, Scottish researchers have modified the genes of pigs in such a way that they are resistant to certain diseases.

Agriculture has more CO. required2 save

The Commission also calls on agriculture to do more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than currently considered. It is “ethically unsatisfactory” that the Swiss climate strategy sets a much lower reduction target for agriculture than, for example, for industry and housing.

According to the federal strategy, agriculture and food must reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent by 2050.

Less meat, more vegetables

Technologies that affect the atmosphere CO2 the commission writes that they are probably not efficient enough to offset emissions that cannot be reduced.

Therefore, from her point of view, there is “nothing to avoid” to increase the reduction target in agriculture. In addition, the number of animals should be “significantly reduced and more plant-based foods grown for humans,” notes the ethics committee. That means: the Swiss population should eat less meat and other animal products – and instead put more vegetables on the menu. (SDA/bgs)

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago