Categories: Politics

Here’s what you need to know: who wins, who loses?

class=”sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc”>

1/6
Federal councilor Karin Keller-Sutter has presented her proposals for the introduction of individual taxes.
Sermin FakiHead of policy

One tax return per married couple? This should be over soon. The Federal Council wants every taxpayer to file his own tax return, regardless of whether he is married or single.

On Wednesday, Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter (60) presented the specific changes to this system change that the Federal Council is proposing to parliament. Blick explains who comes out better and who doesn’t.

What needs to change?

The principle is that married couples should be taxed separately just like unmarried couples. That is why everyone must complete a tax return. Nowadays, married and registered couples are taxed together. This sometimes has an expensive effect: because they both work, the married couple has to pay more tax due to the progression than a cohabiting couple with the same income. The change in individual taxation is intended to eliminate this “marriage penalty” and create incentives so that women in particular can increase their workload. The Federal Council proposal is also an indirect counter-proposal to the FDP initiative for women’s tax justice

Who benefits from the proposal?

According to Keller-Sutter, the tax burden will decrease for a “clear majority” of taxpayers. First of all, the proposal benefits married couples who both earn approximately the same amount. Many retired couples will also pay less taxes. However, because the Federal Council is adjusting the tax rate for direct federal taxes, unmarried people without children will also benefit. In concrete terms, tax rates for low and middle incomes must be reduced. The basic compensation will be increased from 15,000 to 20,000 francs. Very, very, very good earners, on the other hand, should pay a little more.

Who is being asked to pay more?

Couples who live according to a traditional family model would have to pay more taxes. Couples with children are particularly affected, as the Federal Council increases the child tax deduction for direct federal tax from 6,600 to 12,000 francs. Paradoxically, this can lead to a higher tax burden: the deduction is shared between both parents – and if the mother has no income, she cannot deduct anything. In this case, only the father can deduct 6,000 francs. It should be noted that 40 percent of families pay no federal taxes at all. Initially nothing changes for them.

More about taxes
Retirees can breathe a sigh of relief
Federal Council shows heart for poor Hüsli owners
Especially the middle class
We pay up to three billion too much in taxes
Truck drivers and lorry drivers
World organization owns 400 million euros and pays no taxes
According to climate protection – yes
Now new taxes are on the table

In the longer term, at best, because the Federal Council wants cantons and municipalities to also switch to individual taxes. But it is not yet possible to say what the effects will be there. The cantons are satisfied with the way in which they implement individual taxation. In principle, a canton could also give preference to single-income families.

Advertisement

Unmarried couples with children could also pay more taxes. This is especially true if they have very high incomes. However, for low and middle incomes, the additional tax burden is offset by the increased child deduction and the reduction in the tax rate. But the same applies here: this initially only affects direct federal tax.

What does this mean for public finances?

When it comes to direct federal taxes, the federal government assumes a revenue shortfall of 1 billion francs per year. Of this, the federal government contributes 800 million francs and the cantons 200 million francs.

What’s next?

The Federal Council has now referred the proposals to parliament. The committees there will first review the file, followed by the National Council and the Council of States. It is completely unclear when individual taxation will come into effect; that will certainly take another two to three years. And that only applies to the federal level. The cantons will need more time.

And even in the Federal Parliament (almost) everything is possible. It is even conceivable that the template crashes. Most parties want to abolish the marriage penalty. But there is disagreement about how.

Advertisement

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago