Categories: Politics

Less organic land needed: the federal government is once again protecting farmers

class=”sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc”>

1/5
The Federal Council led by the Minister of Economic Affairs wants to demand fewer biodiversity areas from farmers than previously planned.

After Parliament spared agriculture during last December’s austerity round and omitted a reduction in direct payments of around 55 million euros in 2024, the Federal Council now also wants to further improve the economic and social conditions for the farming community.

The government wants to consider less arable land for new biodiversity areas than previously planned. This is one of the many provisions that the Federal Council has sent for consultation in the package of regulations on agricultural policy from 2022.

The federal government should pay for crop insurance

The consultation will last until May 1. The federal government should also be able to contribute to premiums for crop insurance, for example. In addition, in the future, partners working on the farm must be socially insured to receive direct payments.

More about Swiss agriculture
“He went overboard”
The almighty Mr. Knight
Swiss votes support the uprising
“Such a protest is not appropriate in Switzerland”
Hidden subsidies
Peasants’ revolt against cheap flour
More money after divorce
The SVP of all people is abandoning farmers
Council of States against counter-proposal
Farmers resist further demands
Exclusive evaluation
Who gets involved with the ‘peasant parliamentarians’?

The Federal Council has now made some clarifications. This also applies to the new biodiversity areas. By accepting a motion by St. Gallen SVP councilor Esther Friedli (46), Parliament last December called for the postponement of the 3.5 percent requirement in the ecological performance certificate until 2025.

Fewer organic areas than planned

The requirements for the 3.5 percent in arable farming are now being made more flexible, as representatives of the Federal Office of Agriculture have announced.

In concrete terms, only 3.5 percent of open arable land needs to be created as a biodiversity area. Previously, the percentage included not only open arable land, but also artificial meadows. This step reduces the impact by 40 percent: only 5,600 hectares instead of 9,300 new areas are planned for arable farming. (SDA)

Advertisement

Source:Blick

Share
Published by
Livingstone

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago