Categories: Opinion

The word “yes” to inequality

Christmas is in a week. I wouldn’t do justice to the title of this column if I were writing about a real Christmas. So I am writing about New Year’s goods: about expensive money.

Defeat Kappeler explains in his book Wealth for All how to best distribute wealth. The former trade unionist is not calling for an inheritance tax, as one might think, given his professional background. Against. According to the economist and author Kappeler should apply to income, since people with low incomes also receive capital income such as interest, dividends, and profits. Ownership should be encouraged. I wrote about it here last Sunday.

When Beat Kappeler presented his work at the book launch in the fall, Melanie Haner was also on the podium. She heads the social policy department of the Research Institute for Swiss Economic Policy at the University of Lucerne (IWP). In her doctoral dissertation, she explored the question of how saying yes affects the distribution of income and wealth.

Opposites attract. The case is the other way around. “These kind of merge into a heap,” says Melanie Hener. “He who makes a lot of money in the labor market also uses his best chances to find a good match in the marriage market,” the scientist writes in his dissertation. Saying “yes” to the registry office not only changes the life and financial situation of the couple: it also leads to increased income inequality and, therefore, to redistribution in society.

Connoisseurs of European history will remember the Habsburgs when they hear this: “Let others wage wars, you, happy Austria, get married.” Not everyone has to be married. Only people with blue blood and the highest possible territorial claims are eligible.

Yet much has changed since the days of the Habsburgs. Melanie Haner cites social mobility as the reason. It refers to movements among different social classes. In other words, that people from the same social class do not belong to the same social class for generations – as was the case with the Habsburgs.

advertising

Hener determined this social mobility based on the assets of the parents of the future spouses. Here she learned that parental assets, that is, potential inheritance, often differ greatly. So in a married couple, the man’s parents are richer than the woman’s parents – or vice versa. Melanie Hehner concludes: “The social status of a spouse today is much more important than his marital status.”

Have a good Advent season and of course a good party.

Source: Blick

Share
Published by
Miller

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago