About the conflict in Israel (offensive without hate)

There is no single reason for war., but thousands; all without meaning for the individual, possibly, but always with meaning for the community. War is based primarily on collective interests, without process think of an individual. You could argue that there are no wars in nature, and I think that is true, but there are battles. We see the ants fighting fiercely, however, after end the conflictthey continue their existence without any traces of trenches and death, without harboring hatred and resentment, which is the most common reason for the renewal of conflicts that lead to war again.

If you fight hate you kill; If you fight without hatred, you defend yourself. It is the ingredient of hatred that turns a fight into war, and that ingredient is exclusively a man, because it is never found in nature. like a boxer which in the midst of conflict becomes angry, so it is also lost whenever we associate with anger in conflicts of any nature.

Peace is not the natural state of man; You have to achieve it as if it were a goal.

We are born in the midst of a natural struggle which, accepted by any other species, becomes a source emotional conflict for us. The effort required to achieve things is subjectively confused with struggle. If only we saw fighting as a simple instinct; suffering as a part of life; needs as natural incentives for development in this world. We are the only species that stops adding the weight of our torment to any event that causes us to suffer. But to return to the central theme, nobody wins if the victory flag is hatred and resentment.

What is happening now the same in Israel, It is the development of a premeditated plan of a bloody and rebellious radical group. That’s the reality. The effect of these acts could be exactly what the group wants: terror and hatred. The first is an almost physiological and reactive effect on any human being; but hatred is something else.

It is cooked on low heat and is not a reflex impulse, but necessary competition and the will of man, like those fires that have to be blown and blown very close to the face, until they become a sustainable flame. It is difficult to see severe violence and recommend to those who suffer it how to act; It would even look like an act of indifferent arrogance. However, if the victims of this violence and their families fall into this game of resentment, and respond in kind attacks, they reward those victimizers with exactly what they want.

Hate destabilizes those who suffer it. You can’t think straight when you sit in one. If a a mountaineer climbs a steep cliff, Your every move must be carefully orchestrated, so you don’t fall into the void.

If at that moment of holding on to the stone or putting your foot on the support you lost concentration remembering some past grievances, your chances of survival would be slim. On a much larger and bloodier scale, if those who fight in defense of their cause become aggressors, not only will they not be able to do their job well, but they will never win, because the seeds of senseless hatred will have already perished. germinated in them.i it will keep growing. FendYes, but not letting anger color the offensive.

The solidarity of the world is in favor of the acts necessary to defend themselves; but once that goal is achieved, without violence turning into hatred, those ways of peace must necessarily be sought, without grievances become a chronic cobweb. It would no longer be a problem with the teeth tooth, which eventually leaves both of them toothless. It would be a strategic question; It would be like breaking the bow, cutting the spear, and burning the chariots in the fire, but without giving those bloody groups what they want most: the hatred of the world and victims, which would make any strategy to defend themselves much less effective.