Categories: Opinion

Clarified and enlightened column on AI: how intelligent is a natural person?

class=”sc-29f61514-0 jbwksb”>

Rene ShawPhilosopher and Managing Director of the Swiss Institute for Economic Policy (IWP)

I asked the chatbot Chat-GPT to write a generally understandable column “Glare” about the possibilities and side effects of artificial intelligence. Please:

“Dear readers,

artificial intelligence (AI) is a problem that affects us all. But what is really behind this technology and how does it affect our lives?

AI allows machines to perform tasks that would normally require human intelligence. She can recognize patterns in data, understand language, and make decisions. This opens up many applications such as personalized recommendations, more efficient processes, and even medical diagnoses.

more on the topic
Percentage of women in universities
More about women and men
You don’t need patrons
Scandal! Men and women are happy
What did my father think
I know the answer – but what is the question?

However, there are also issues that we need to consider. Protecting privacy is an important issue because AI is data-driven. It is imperative that we use our data responsibly and protect it from misuse.

Another aspect is the impact on jobs. AI can automate certain tasks, making jobs redundant. However, at the same time, new opportunities and professions are opening up in the field of AI. It is important that we adapt and learn to keep up with the changes.

The issue of control is also important. AI can learn and make decisions, but we need to make sure everything is under control. It is important that people make the final decisions and critically question the results of AI.

AI development is an exciting journey that offers us many opportunities. But we also need to be careful and understand that AI is not perfect. It cannot replace human empathy and creativity. We must use AI responsibly and exploit the potential it offers. Let’s work together to create a future where people and machines work together in harmony.”

Do you find the text smarter and better worded than some of the other stuff you read? Even more reasonable than what you could understand yourself?

A sharp conclusion: either people have actually created an algorithmic superpotency that, unconsciously, makes better (linguistic) decisions than themselves, or, on the contrary, something else arises, which some have always suspected: people, too, are just an opinion machine, beating phrases.

What do you prefer? Where: do you have a choice at all?

René Scheuil is a philosopher and director of the Swiss Institute for Economic Policy (IWP) in Lucerne. He writes to Blick every second Monday.

Source: Blick

Share
Published by
Miller

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago