Categories: Market

Big comparison – the dimensions are huge

class=”sc-3778e872-0 cKDKQr”>

1/10
CHF 66 billion was allocated for the UBS rescue in 2008. Eugen Haltiner (Federal Banking Commission), Jean-Pierre Roth (SNB), Pascal Couchepin (Federal President) and Federal Councilor Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf (left to right) present the bailout plan for UBS on October 16, 2008.

Never again state bank bailout! 2008 everyone agrees. Yet things turned out differently: After just 15 years, the state had to lend a helping hand to the financial center again. According to Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter (59), the takeover of CS by UBS is not a state bailout. However, the state carries great risks. Blick compares the 2008 UBS bank bailout to the current CS emergency takeover. The dimensions are huge.

government money

In the fall of 2008, UBS is threatened with bankruptcy. At that time, the bank was converted by the federal government and the national bank. Supported a total of 66 billion Swiss francs.

Represent the new Superbank UBS today if needed 259 billion francs ready. That’s four times more than in 2008. This means that the Gotthard Base Tunnel could be built at 21 times, or twice the federal government’s total debt. For comparison: Dealing with the corona epidemic has cost the federal government 32 billion francs so far.

To win

In 2008, the government’s commitment bore fruit. By 2013, 66 billion shares, approximately 6 billion francs. The primary added value of the support, salvation of the economy.

Even now, with the urgent takeover of CS, there is an opportunity for the state to make a financial profit. At 100 of the 259 SNB billion, the federal government charges a 0.25 percent annual premium to UBS for supply. So that makes 250 million – or 21 million per month. The premium must be paid by UBS as long as the warranty is requested. The federal government could rally for months before CS is definitely merged with UBS. If the CS recovery is successful, the federal government will make a deal. That would be a nice side effect. The most important reason for state intervention is disgust a global financial crisis.

Causes

In the years prior to 2008, UBS speculated on worthless real estate securities in the United States. The collapse of the American bank Lehman Brothers, a month before UBS nearly collapsed, destroyed confidence in the financial sector in a matter of days. There are concerns about outflows in client funds and solvency at UBS. The federal government and the Federal Reserve rush to help the bank because it is “too big to fail.”

advert

Government assistance was required for the immediate takeover of CS as various scandals eroded trust in CS and customers had largely withdrawn their money. The announcement by one of the main shareholders of Saudi CS that he would no longer invest a penny in the bank played a role in this.

heroes

2008 is the team at UBS Peter Kurer (DRP, 73) and Marcel Rohner (CEO, 58) at the helm. They discussed the rescue plan with Swiss authorities almost overnight. Marcel Rohner’s successor as CEO Oswald GruebelManaged the bank until 2011. From 2011 to 2020 Sergio Ermotti CEO of UBS (62). It gave the bank a radical cure by drastically reducing risk investment banking. During his tenure, he transformed UBS from an old-fashioned universal bank into the world’s largest wealth management bank. Ermotti remained at the top until 2020. The same Sergio Ermotti will become CEO of the new Superbank next Wednesday.

Recent senior executives of CS Axel Lehmann (DRP, 64) and Ulrich Corner (CEO, 60). Over the past few weeks, they’ve needed the help of the federal government and the SNB to save their hard-hit 167-year-old financial institution from bankruptcy.

political consequences

After the financial crisis, politics and business agreed. Such covert government action should never happen again at UBS. The “too big to fail” rules are intended to ensure that Swiss business can be separated from systemically important banks. This includes, for example, the deposit and lending business as well as the continuing processing of payment transactions in an emergency. The rules also include higher capital adequacy requirements for banks.

advert

Processing of the CS case is gaining momentum. The National Council office announced last Monday that it plans to set up a parliamentary commission of inquiry (PUK). The takeover of CS by UBS is also a topic in the special session after Easter. It’s also an election year: Superbank UBS will likely be a permanent issue in the second half of the year.

Source :Blick

Share
Published by
Tim

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago