Categories: Market

Problem escalates: Comparis takes Finma’s decision to court

class=”sc-29f61514-0 icZBHN”>

1/5
Compareis has been arguing with Finma since 2019.

The conflict between the Swiss Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Finma) and Comparis hit the headlines in March this year. The comparison platform announced that it had to lay off a large number of people due to restructuring. One reason: the dispute with Finma. Now, almost seven months later, the next boom is coming.

Finma classified Comparis as an insurance intermediary as part of a procedure. This means the company must now register as an insurance broker and will be regulated as such. However, Compari will appeal this decision.

Collecting profits is not yet a problem

Six months ago, Comparis was afraid it might be expensive. At the time, Finma announced that it could retroactively collect profits from Comparis’ insurance brokerage since 2015. However, the current decision does not include such a “confiscation of unlawfully seized profits” issue.

More about Finma
Comco offers suggestions
Are there strict requirements for the UBS-CS agreement?
Finma is failing
Where is Federal Councilor Karin Keller-Sutter?
Greensill funding scandal
Who is Finma’s target and who is not?

With Finma’s decision, Comparis must immediately register in the register of insurance intermediaries and “comply with the prescribed information obligations to consumers”, Finma said in a statement on Friday morning.

Comparison disagrees

However, Comparis denies being an insurance broker. Finma has already been aligned and the processes have been adapted on a voluntary basis. Comparis processes quote orders through a registered agent.

However, Finma does not accept this. Comparis adapted its original business model by ordering quotes from a sister company registered as an insurance broker. But the authority maintains that insurance comparison is a “critical function” in underwriting a product and that it belongs to Comparis.

Advert

According to Finma’s statement, the decision is not yet legally binding. It was predictable that Comparis now wanted to challenge this. “The court must consider the matter from an impartial perspective,” Comparis founder and Chairman Richard Eisler said in a statement today, Friday. The company had previously announced that it would refer such a decision to the Federal Administrative Court. (SDA/wgr)

Source :Blick

Share
Published by
Tim

Recent Posts

Terror suspect Chechen ‘hanged himself’ in Russian custody Egyptian President al-Sisi has been sworn in for a third term

On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…

1 year ago

Locals demand tourist tax for Tenerife: “Like a cancer consuming the island”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…

1 year ago

Agreement reached: this is how much Tuchel will receive for his departure from Bayern

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…

1 year ago

Worst earthquake in 25 years in Taiwan +++ Number of deaths increased Is Russia running out of tanks? Now ‘Chinese coffins’ are used

At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…

1 year ago

Now the moon should also have its own time (and its own clocks). These 11 photos and videos show just how intense the Taiwan earthquake was

The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…

1 year ago

This is how the Swiss experienced the earthquake in Taiwan: “I saw a crack in the wall”

class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…

1 year ago