class=”sc-29f61514-0 fQbOYE”>
“Laundering and unfounded allegations of climate friendliness”: filed a complaint with the State Secretariat of Economic Affairs (Seco) against eight companies for consumer protection, unfair competition or green laundering. The Blame: “You’re misleading consumers,” says Sara Stalder, director of consumer protection.
Among the companies are beverage maker Coca-Cola Switzerland, Swisscom and the Zurich Zoo, as “Tages-Anzeiger” wrote. For example, companies consider mobile phone subscriptions “climate neutral”, heating fuel “CO2-neutral” or children’s porridge or even “climate positive”. Such statements about their CO2-Reduction and -emissions incomprehensible, criticizes consumer protection.
In addition, consumer protection has filed a complaint with the Swiss Trade Fairs Commission for unfair advertising against travel company Elite Flights, baby food maker Hipp, and energy supplier Kübler.
Consumer protection bases the complaint on five grounds: the advertising statement cannot be proved in some cases because, for example, information about CO2-Company as well as CO emissions2-Discounts were missing or missing, says the article. And also: “Many compensation projects don’t change much in actual CO2– Condensation in the atmosphere » says in the rationale for consumer protection.
A recent study that has not yet been independently reviewed by ETH Zurich, Cambridge University, and Harvard University supports this criticism. For the first time, all existing studies of voluntary CO2Benedict Probst of ETH Zurich, lead author of the study, stated that compensation was evaluated and summarized.
Thus, it was concluded that approximately 88 percent of existing voluntary compensation projects do not actually contribute to emissions reductions. Climate protection certificates cannot deliver what they promise.
Faced with consumer protection complaints, some companies in “Tages-Anzeiger” pointed out that they have their own CO.2– Reductions take precedence over offset with CO2-Certificates. Others think that the term “climate neutral” should be questioned.
A consumer protection complaint does not mean that the company is actually engaging in unfair competition. Seco will now review the allegations. (oco)
Source :Blick
I’m Tim David and I work as an author for 24 Instant News, covering the Market section. With a Bachelor’s Degree in Journalism, my mission is to provide accurate, timely and insightful news coverage that helps our readers stay informed about the latest trends in the market. My writing style is focused on making complex economic topics easy to understand for everyone.
On the same day of the terrorist attack on the Krokus City Hall in Moscow,…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/4Residents of Tenerife have had enough of noisy and dirty tourists.It's too loud, the…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/7Packing his things in Munich in the summer: Thomas Tuchel.After just over a year,…
At least seven people have been killed and 57 injured in severe earthquakes in the…
The American space agency NASA would establish a uniform lunar time on behalf of the…
class="sc-cffd1e67-0 iQNQmc">1/8Bode Obwegeser was surprised by the earthquake while he was sleeping. “It was a…