The proofread presents the 20 best mistakes of the year (And we like this: Ha Ha.)

And because we as correctors always think completely rationally and structured, we have divided the errors into five categories. (miserable nerds. Editor’s note)

Well, who doesn’t know him, the corn prince? The fact that he is actually based in Saudi Arabia is a bit surprising, but why not? Perhaps a completely different kind of liquid gold will soon flow through the oil pipelines…

The neighbor also seems to be a very bad finger, this hangover. The rest of the department? We like this: 🤷🏼‍♀️

These are not errors at all, Watson creates his own language structure here – everything logically builds on each other. Because shortly afterwards the residents of Kater also appear. Or is it the superlative of the hangover?

Alcohol is the last resort for many people in excruciating situations. But what does it tell us when the editors at watson clearly can’t take their work sober anymore?!

But no, don’t always think the worst! Maybe they just played too much bullshot bingo at Watson’s.

And if it gets too wild, we’ll call…

… the party brigade!

Yes, we’re still sober. But when it comes to the Russian dictator, oops, the watson editors seem to be completely different even without the influence of alcohol.

The author is actually right: an article that would characterize Putin as a human being really no longer fits. Or was it the outrageous combination of the words “Putin” and “rational” that led to stumbling here?

This editor also seems to agree that Putin would be better off outside the civilized world.

Sounds sympathetic, the Waldimir.

If it fails to move Waldimir to its natural territory, there seems to be only one solution left for some: a counter-attack.

But Russia doesn’t get off badly with Watson. Such a foreign gentleman is quite sexy, isn’t it?

And then with Apple equipment!

However, sometimes the editors also seem to enjoy giving us an awful lot of torment(s). The challenge of the day: How do I fit as many errors as possible into two short sentences?

And the error parade works perfectly even without slippery animals.

When you have corrected the first mistake very gently, hit it again with the hammer! (At least the creative image reassures us a little.)

Hey, you editor-in-chief, don’t you think, seeing something like that, that compensation for pain and suffering for proofreading would be appropriate?

Sometimes we are also curious what exclusive information the editors of watson already have:

What can MBS do very well with Trump?!

And the secret wedding of Ignazio and Emmanuel Cassis, née Macron, would almost have eluded us without Watson. The editors are about to win the next prize for investigative journalism!

We correctors are probably just too weak to understand all the blatant information correctly. This certainly includes this brand new crime genre – Watson is always at the forefront of trends!

For us, however, this makes a lot of sense: who couldn’t use it almost every day, the search expert? (We only say: mobile phone, keys, wallet…)

And that doesn’t sound like a bad idea either:

Maybe next time we have a spelling problem we should just consult the consulate.

Okay, we admit it: sometimes the Watson editors are totally innocent! Here, for example, the automatic hyphenation tries to outsmart us.

Wouldn’t that be a nice team name? At least the hyphenation is so confident in their creation that it has now been declared the new standard. Weed buyers ahoy!

But we are lucky: after all, we get to use a great spelling program that is always ready to help and advise us.

Sure, of course the adrenaline rides were intended, what else? While we’d love to try the Adrenalins seats thing, does anyone know who we should contact?

But what good are all the good spelling tips if the associated program ends up participating in the bullying initiated by Google?

So that’s it for now, see you next year! Stay sober, maybe go to a Grass Shoppers game (a little tip: make sure to book the Adrenalins seats!) and keep up with MBS and Trump – we think something is up.

PS: Are you also in favor of a fee for proofreading by watson? Commented! (You also know that Adrian is always sooo happy with as many comments as possible!)

Source: Blick