Carolina Brid said that she did not commit a crime before the law

Carolina Brid, a former beauty queen, has assured that she has not committed any crime before the law after it was discovered that she received economic benefits from the Institute for Training and Utilization of Human Resources (Ifarhu).

The former beauty queen explained that she submitted requests to that institution for years, was rejected several times, until she finally decided on a “credit”.

Also, she stated that she does not know or is personally related to anyone, denying speculation that they were the ones who received resources institutions allegedly associated with politicians.

“I think they are connecting me to other cases, maybe special ones, but well, I can’t say anything about it and I can’t say anything because in front of my face law I haven’t committed any crime“, concluded the beauty.

Brid’s clarifications, shared by Tags Pa on Instagram, come two days after it was reported that he had allegedly received an amount of $25,952.40 as economic assistance

It’s worth mentioning that Brid didn’t go into further detail about resource usage or amount and at no point did he refer to it as aid, instead using the phrase “loan“.

Before his explanations, Brid was subjected critics on his Instagram profile, he was asked explanations and they even recommended him to return the money.

“You are talking about yourself”, “Do you see that it is not good to spit? And this one had its day of responsibility”, “I’m waiting for you to pay the bill for 25 thousand”, “Manaa you are Mary Help of Christianssince you are receiving help” and “Luxuries, “high class”, yeyesada, travel at the expense of the STATE”, are some of the comments.

On the other hand, neither Jean Modelcurrent champion in 7th streetneither Rafe Lucadoformer contestant of the same program, they looked back on scandalsince they too allegedly received financial assistance from the institution.

Fernando Brocesocial media content creator and film student at NOWhe confirmed that he received a “stipend” from the entity and reiterated that he did not use his influence to receive said compensation.